A CountryÕs
Economics: Resources and Survival
Introductory Lesson
To Fifth Grade Economics
David Weinman- MAT
Methods I 533
Context: This is an
introductory lesson to a unit on economics for the fifth grade. Students will
be able to use their knowledge basic mathematics skills (adding, subtracting),
and previous knowledge of the differences between a needs and wants as an aid
in this lesson. Students will be able to use their active listening skills, and
social skills from previous lessons when interacting in group discussions and
the resource game. This lesson will provide a foundation for studentsÕ economic
understanding of supply and demand, economic decision-making, opportunity cost,
scarcity, and needs and wants. This lesson and unit will take place during
allocated social studies time during a daily classroom schedule. The length of
the lesson will be approximately one hour and thirty minutes.
Rationale: In the
fifth grade, students are at a developmentally appropriate stage, and are
cognitively ready to take an active role in understanding the importance of
economics in their life. Students at this age are in PiagetÕs Concrete
Operational Stage. They are able to solve complex problems, understand
reversibility, and conservation of units efficiently (Woolfolk, p. 32).
Students will be able to understand classification of units, and how they
different categories relate to each other. As Vygotsky believed, it is
important for students at this age to learn through cooperative dialogues, and
use a co-constructed process when doing so.
3. Objectives:
Rationale: Students
at this grade level are at a developmentally appropriate stage to use
cooperative dialogues with classmates to demonstrate their understanding of
opportunity cost. Within the context of VygotskyÕs Sociocultural Theory,
students will be able to learn how to think, learn, and behave at higher levels
through social interaction. Their understanding of the vocabulary will increase
through their social interaction with peers, (Woolfolk pg. 45). Through social
interaction, students will come to understand that deciding to make an economic
decision at one point in time would take the place of another opportunity to
make a decision in its place.
Rationale: This
objective relates to Howard GardnerÕs logical-mathematical intelligence,
(Woolfolk, p 109). Students will apply their understanding of scarcity to their
ability to analyze numerical patterns in how the quantity of resources affects
demand for them. Students should be able to apply their understanding of how
scarcity of a product affects a value of the product, and the cost of how much
someone will sacrifice to obtain what they want. This relates to SternbergÕs
theory of practical/contextual intelligence, in the context of how scarcity
directly relates to the supply of a unit. If students are going to learn about
how supply affects demand, then they should also know learn about how the
scarcity of a product affects the demand, (Woolfolk, pg. 112).
Rationale: In
reference to SternbergÕs theory of practical/contextual/ intelligence, students
will learn to think practically about how supply and demand relates to authentic
scenarios like resources for survival. The practical intelligence, as it refers
to the studentsÕ understanding of supply and demand, will be able to increase
as students communicate with each other in determining the fluctuating ratio,
(Woolfolk, pg. 112). Students will be able to understand and analyze the
process a person could go through to acquire something they desire, and how the
supply and demand surrounding the product affects the possibility of obtaining
it.
Rational: It is
important that students understand the difference between these terms because
it relates directly to their intellectual choices that occur during their
lifeÕs survival experiences. SternbergÕs contextual intelligence theory relates
to studentsÕ ability to want to manipulate their countries survival chances, by
making the most out of what resources their country was given, (Woolfolk, pg
112). Students will be able to determine a resourceÕs level of importance by
applying their knowledge of point scores in the resource game with the supply,
demand, and price fluctuation.
4. Benchmark(s): Social Studies (Economics) Oregon
2006-07 Standards
Rationale: By the
end of fifth grade, students should be able to apply their understanding of
economics, to their daily financial transactions, and to further economic
education.
Rational: The tables
should be arranged so that students can easily apply their understanding of the
group objectives, the rules of the economic game, and form countries systematically.
It is important for the classroom to have enough space for the students to move
around and negotiate trades efficiently. It is important for students to have a
designated area or action zone where students can interact most effectively
during the lessonÕs activity, (Woolfolk, pg. 404). Woolfolk believes that if
students have adequate space to interact and learn within their classroom, it
will positively influence the learning process, (Woolfolk, pg. 404). It is
important for each student to have a copy of the rules, the charts, and
objectives clearly accessible so they can demonstrate their understanding of
the expectations and proceed with the activity efficiently. It is important to
have the materials for the lesson and game ready to go so the teacher can make
smooth transitions from explanation of key terms (using the prepared white
board or poster paper), to the distribution of resources for counties in the
economic game. The teacher should have the prepared knowledge of the lesson
well ready to teach so that students will receive correct and a valuable
lesson.
Materials:
Rational: Students
need writing tools for filling out the country resource chart. The teacher
needs to have access to the white board, overhead, and a resource chart to
demonstrate examples within the lesson, and economic resource game. The teacher
needs to have colored paper cut up into easily exchangeable resources. Every
student should have their own resource chart to fill out, and notebook paper to
log why they decided to make a trade for resources.
6.
Introduction: (15
minutes)
Teacher:
Draw example charts on the black/white board.
á
If ten students want a sticker, but there are only two
available, it means that the demand for stickers is high and the supply is low.
á
If 14 students want to use markers to color with, and
there are 20 markers available, it means the supply is high, and the demand is
high.
á
If 20 markers are available to color with, but all
students want to use pencils for their drawings, the supply of markers is high,
but the demand for them is low.
á
If the price of a teddy bear is usually $3, there are
only five of them, and 40 people want one. The price of the teddy bear might
increase because 40 people might be willing to pay more for it.
Rationale: It is
important for students to understand that economics can be as simple as looking
at the quantity of a product and evaluating how many people are interested in
the product. In reference to Piaget, it is important for students to be able
assimilate and accommodate new information with their understanding of supply
and demand, to increase their understanding of economics (Woolfolk, pg 58).
Teacher: Explain
opportunity cost. (The cost of doing one thing/making a choice replaces the
opportunity to do another task, (Rhoads, pg. 13).
Rationale: Students
should be able to demonstrate their understanding of supply and demand, and
apply it to the concept of opportunity cost when making a decision with a
limited supply of money or resources. In reference to Piaget, it is important
that students will be able to organize and assimilate a variety of economic
terms together as they relate to the process economic decision-making,
(Woolfolk, pg. 58).
Teacher:
Explain scarcity: shortage, or not having enough supply of a
unit, (Barrett, pg 14-15).
Rationale: It is
important for students to demonstrate their understanding of the concept supply
and apply it with the concept of scarcity. In reference to BloomÕs Taxonomy, it
is important for students to develop knowledge and understanding of the term
supply before they can apply it towards an antonym
scarce. Students should be able to assimilate and accommodate an
understanding of the concept of scarcity, as it refers to the demand of a
product, and the increased price if there are limited quantities of the
product, (Woolfolk, pg. 58).
Teacher:
Rationale: Students
should be able to demonstrate the difference between a need and a want in terms
of how it affects the demand of a product. In reference to MaslowÕs Hierarchy
of needs, students will be more likely to trade for resources that relate to
safety and survival (food, and trees) over wealth in times where food and trees
are limited and worth more, (Woolfolk, pg 353).
7.
Sharing Objectives: (2 min) (Have objectives written on white board, or poster
paper before the lesson begins).
By the end of this lesson:
á
Understand economic vocabulary: opportunity cost,
scarcity, supply and demand, and needs and wants.
á
Apply these terms when playing the economic resource
game.
á
Understand why demand affects opportunity cost, supply,
and price influence.
á
Be able to identify and describe why certain trades
were made using the new vocabulary.
á
Create a record of trades with descriptions explaining
why trades were made.
Rationale: It is
important for students to understand the purpose of the lesson, and how it is
going to be applied to the economic resource game. By explaining to students
that they need to be able to understand the economic terms before playing a
game, will motivate the learning of these terms. By explaining to students that
their reward for learning these economic terms is playing a game, then students
have an incentive, and participation levels are likely to increase, (Woolfolk,
pg 352-3).
Learning Activities: (Game introduction) (5 min explanation)
Teacher:
Rationale: Having
the students form groups by numbering off allows students to interact with
peers they might not normally socialize and work with. The resource game is a
way for students to apply their knowledge and understanding of the economic
vocabulary to an interactive simulation of trading resources between countries.
VygotskyÕs Sociocultural perspectives include the co-constructed process,
emphasizing the importance for students to negotiate with each other, and work
together to solve a problem, (Woolfolk p. 45). It is important for students to
learn to work together as a country (team) when making trades for the benefit
of the group. It is important for students to understand the possibility of
resources in the game being limited (scarce), and causing the demand and price
to fluctuate. This relates to MaslowÕs Hierarchy in where survival resources
are a necessity (deficiency needs), and if more people need them, the demand
will increase as well as the value for them, (Woolfolk, pg. 353).
Rules: 5-7 min explanation of rules, answer questions
Teacher: Explain the
rules to the students:
á
One food (orange) for each person
á
One tree (green) for each person
á
You can only trade with a person once, only one trade
at a time between a pair.
á
Subtract five from total score if missing each required
food or tree for each member.
á
Everyone must write down what was traded, and why the
traded happened using economic terms after each trade.
Rationale: Having
students only trading with a person once, will apply their understanding of
opportunity cost by picking the best economical trades possible for their
country. Allowing students one trade per pair at a time will minimize
negotiation time, and make trades less complicated. Setting a required minimum
of resources for citizens of each country provides studentsÕ opportunity to
apply their understanding of scarcity, supply and demand, opportunity cost, and
needs and wants to ÒsurvivalÓ in the economic resource game.
Hand out the resources randomly to each group: Use this
format when handing out the resources: (3 min)
Rationale: The
resources will be distributed randomly before the first round so that every
country will have its own unique supply of resources. Some countries will have
more of one particular resource (food, trees), and less of another (gold,
silver, oil). The dynamics of each round will give some countries an advantage
in wealth (gold, silver), but not in the survival necessities (food, shelter).
Students will come to base their trading on the needs and wants of their
country, the supply, the scarcity of resources, the demand of the resources
available, and the opportunity cost of making one trade over another.
Country Resource Forms
Name of Country |
|
Gold |
Pts |
Silver |
Pts |
Oil |
Pts |
Tree |
Pts |
Food |
Pts |
Points Total/Price |
Normal Round |
Round 1: Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium |
Round 2: Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extreme Round |
Round 3: Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Round Score Key:
|
1 Gold |
1 Silver |
1 Oil Barrel |
1 Tree |
1 Food |
Round 1 |
10 points |
5 points |
10 points |
3 points |
5 points |
Round 2 |
6 points |
8 points |
18 points |
6 points |
8 points |
Round 3 |
4 points |
2 points |
4 points |
10 points |
20 points |
Rationale: The
resource chart was designed so that students/countries could keep track of each
type of resource, how much it is worth, and the total value after each round.
The round key demonstrates how certain resources are more valuable during
different rounds. The chart was created to adjust to the demand of resources
changing, and countries starting with a larger quantify of a particular type of
resource will not be at a complete disadvantage throughout the game.
Rounds Key:
Regular Conditions, Round 1: (10 minutes trading time)
Teacher: ÒOk, round one has ended. Make sure you
meet with your country and add up your total resources, their points, and have
your explanations for why you completed your trades complete. Redistribute the
resources you have amongst your country members.Ó (3 min)
Rationale: The first
round provides an opportunity for students to learn how to play the game, and
countries trying to obtain larger quantities of the more valuable resources
they want. In reference to PiagetÕs adaptation and equilibrium principles,
students will learn to assimilate and accommodate value of the resource based
on the round score key, with the supply of the resource and its demand,
(Woolfolk, pg. 58). It is important for students to look pay attention to the
points the resource is worth and its value in comparison in value with other
resources before deciding to make a trade.
Medium Conditions, Round 2: (10 minutes)
Teacher: ÒNow
that you have had some practice negotiating, the conditions are going to
change. It turns out that there is a sudden demand for more oil so countries
can create more factories, and output of machines used in our lives. Pay
attention to the score key and the value of each resource for this round and
the next round. Round two begins now.Ó
Rationale: Students
continue to apply their understanding of the economic vocabulary with their
economic decision making process. In reference to PiagetÕs adaptation
principles, students will be able to accommodate the changes in this round to
their current resources, and the differences from the previous round,
(Woolfolk, pg. 58). It provides an opportunity for other counties that started
with more oil to have an economic advantage over other countries when trading.
During this round, students should be thinking about the pattern of how
resource values will fluctuate, and start planning for the trades towards the
end of the game.
Extreme Conditions, Round 3: (13-15 minutes)
Teacher:
Rationale: In the
final round, it is important for students to demonstrate their understanding of
how scarce resources may increase their value if the demand for them has
increased. In this round, students will have more of an urgency to obtain the
resources they need for survival, and result in synthesizing (create) new
strategies to ensure their countries survival chances. As this round concludes,
students are able to evaluate their progress in the activity, and how well they
have learned the new economic vocabulary.
8.
Closure: 5-10 minutes sharing
Teacher:
Rationale: The
closure provides students an opportunity for students to reflect on their
reactions to the lesson, exchange responses on what they took away from it, and
if it was affective for them to learn the terms as they applied them to a real
simulation. This process relates to VygotskyÕs Sociocultural theory. It relates
in the sense that students will learn from each otherÕs responses to the
lesson, and identify if they achieved the lessonÕs objectives from their own
experiences, (Woolfolk, pg. 45).
9.
Student Evaluation:
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 3 |
Accomplished 5 |
Score |
Students Demonstrate
Their Understanding of the Economic Vocabulary in Their Descriptions of
Trades. |
Students have some sentences
describing the trades they made, but do not include a clear understanding of
the economic topics |
Students describe all the
trades they made. Student describes trades with some correctly used economic
terms. |
Students are able to clearly
describe all their trades using all four economic vocabulary words correctly |
__/5 |
Participation |
Students participate in the
trading, but not in class discussions, or with the teammates in their country |
Students are actively
participating in the trading game, with their country teammates, but not in
class discussions. |
Students participate in
trading, class discussions, and are actively involved with their country
teammates. |
__/5 |
Country Resource Chart |
Students only fill out a
small portion of the table. |
Students fill out most of
the table. |
The entire table is filled
out, and the totals match the individual resource totals accounted for. |
__/5 |
Rationale: Evaluating
students using multidisciplinary methods (math, writing, economic terms) will
provide opportunities to see studentsÕ ability to retain the economic material
through exercises. It is beneficial for students to explain their understanding
of the economic terms through writing, and class discussion in order help
retain the information for further lessons within the unit. Evaluating students
on their participation, and ability to complete a Country Resource chart will
demonstrate studentsÕ ability to understand the game and complete them. The
participation assessment comes from identifying students that trade in during
the role-play activity, and which students provide their examples during the
questioning and reflecting period. Assessing students on their ability to meet
the objectives is crucial to identify their understanding of the lessonÕs
content. The goal for the teacher is to assess the students performance, how
the well the entire class scores (norm-referenced testing), and to develop
further lessons based off of what the class has learned (Woolfolk, pg. 514).
The resource gameÕs purpose was to provide some authentic experience and
opportunity for authentic assessment.
Differentiation and Accommodation: The goal is to accommodate for the diversity of the
classroom. Some students might have ADHD. Some students might need both visual
and auditory explanations of terms.
o
For the ADHD students, I will accommodate them by
pairing them up with a group, giving them specific tasks to follow, have peers
in the group help direct their attention towards the task.
o
For students who need things explained verbally and
visually, I will create diagrams, pictures, charts, and graphs representing the
key terms for the lesson. I will create visuals and will include explanations
with many of the students and lessonÕs examples for a clearer understanding.
Teacher Self-Reflection:
Before: This lesson
is designed to take place during one hour and thirty minute segment of the day.
Although the lesson is a long, it is necessary for student to active during it.
During the lesson time, it is expected that students remain on task, be active
listeners, contribute to discussions, and take an active role in the trading
game. This might be challenging for students who have ADHD. The main goal is to
have the students motivated towards actively participating, following
instructions, asking questions, working in groups, and enjoying learning about
these basic economic terms. The motivation for students during the lesson is
the economic resource game. If the students are not focused at the beginning of
the lesson, then students will not be able to understand the purpose of the
game. It is my goal to explain objectives in a clear way so that students have
a concrete understanding of what is expected of them. I will provide examples
of the economic terms apply to real life situations that students can relate
to. I will provide smooth transitions between explanations and activities.
Resources:
Barrett S. N. (1974) The theory of microeconomic policy.
D.C. Heath and Company
p.14-15
Rhoads, E. S (1985). The EconomistÕs view of the world.
Press Syndicate of the
University of Cambridge p. 13-24
Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational psychology ninth edition.
Pearson Education Inc. p.
32-404
Merriam-WebsterÕs Dictionary (2006). Demand. Merriam Webster
Incorporated. pg. 276
Merriam-WebsterÕs Dictionary (2006). Need. Merriam Webster
Incorporated. Pg. 706
Merriam-WebsterÕs Dictionary (2006). Want. Merriam Webster
Incorporated. Pg. 1173